The IOM Records 304 Million Migrants, and the Majority No Longer Flow from South to North
More than a third of the 304 million international migrants now circulate between developing countries, transforming a migration geography that the West believed it understood.
Western imagination of migration remains fixed on Mediterranean crossings or caravans toward the American border. But this vision represents only a fraction of reality. According to the latest report from the International Organization for Migration (IOM), South-South movements now form the most dynamic segment of global mobility, redefining planetary geopolitical and economic balances.
The Essentials
- 304 million international migrants counted in 2026, including 168 million migrant workers
- More than 36% of flows now move between Global South countries, compared to less than 30% a decade ago
- Financial transfers reached 905 billion dollars in 2024, four times official development assistance
- Asia concentrates 40% of global migrants, ahead of Europe (32%) and North America (18%)
- South-South corridors generate transfer costs lower than traditional circuits
Asia Becomes the Leading Migration Host Continent
Asia today hosts 122 million international migrants, or 40% of the global total. This concentration far exceeds Europe (97 million, 32%) and North America (55 million, 18%). The United Arab Emirates counts 88% foreigners in its population, Saudi Arabia 42%, while Singapore structures its economy around a predominantly imported workforce.
These figures reveal a major geographic shift. In 1990, Europe dominated global migration intake. Thirty-six years later, Gulf countries, Southeast Asia, and Latin America are attracting massively. The Mexico-United States corridor remains the most frequented with 11 million migrants, but it now competes with intra-regional flows: Bangladesh-India, Philippines-Saudi Arabia, or Venezuela-Colombia.
This redistribution is explained by differential economic growth. When Saudi Arabia posts 8% annual growth and launches Vision 2030, it naturally attracts more than Europe in relative stagnation. De-dollarization is accelerating without rupture — financial multipolarity is emerging in stages, and this multipolarity is also visible in the new poles of migration attraction.
Financial Transfers Exceed Public Aid by a Factor of Four
The 905 billion dollars sent by migrants to their countries of origin in 2024 represents four times the amount of official development assistance. These financial transfers now constitute the primary source of external financing for 40 countries, ahead of foreign direct investment and bilateral aid.
India receives 125 billion dollars annually, Mexico 67 billion, China 51 billion. For economies like the Philippines (37 billion) or Bangladesh (25 billion), these flows represent more than 6% of national GDP. Unlike public aid, these transfers arrive directly in families, financing education, health, real estate, and business creation.
Financial technology is revolutionizing these circuits. Western Union and MoneyGram are losing market share to mobile applications like Wise, Remitly, or Wave, which reduce costs from 8-12% to 2-4% per transaction. South-South corridors innovate particularly: Philippines-Singapore transfers now cost less than 1%, while remittances to Africa from Europe remain at 7-9%.
This technical efficiency strengthens the attractiveness of non-Western destinations. A Bangladeshi worker prefers Dubai to London when he can send 98% of his savings rather than 92%, for comparable cost of living and simplified administrative procedures.
Climate Migration Restructures Africa and Asia
Climate-related displacement now represents 21% of internal migrations according to the IOM, with 26 million new climate-displaced persons in 2024. But contrary to Western predictions of migration invasions toward Europe, these populations are directing themselves massively toward cities in their own regions.
In the Sahel, droughts push Fulani herders toward coastal capitals: Dakar, Abidjan, Accra. In Asia, rising oceans displace populations from the Ganges Delta toward Dhaka and Delhi, not toward Europe. Pacific islanders migrate toward New Zealand and Australia, but also toward Fiji and Papua New Guinea.
This climate geography follows economic logic. Lagos attracts more than Lampedusa when it offers jobs, family networks, and no visa requirements. China is experiencing the collapse of its authoritarian demographic model, but compensates through massive immigration from Africa and Southeast Asia, creating new South-South corridors.
Adaptation predominates over exodus. The Green Climate Fund finances retention programs: dikes in Bangladesh, drought-resistant agriculture in the Sahel, sponge cities in Southeast Asia. These investments reduce migration pressure far more effectively than walls at European borders.
The West Loses Its Monopoly on Migration Narrative
This geographic redistribution is accompanied by a loss of narrative influence. When Dubai presents its diversity as an economic asset and Singapore explicitly structures its labor market around immigration, Europe and the United States appear tense and defensive.
Gulf countries standardize their migration policies: talent visas, flexible work permits, pathways to permanent residence. Saudi Arabia launches a “nomad visa” to attract remote workers, the Emirates create golden residences for investors. These policies contrast with Western hardlinings and debates over quotas.
Institutional innovation follows. The Global Compact for Migration, signed by 164 countries in 2018, applies primarily to South-South corridors. The African Union negotiates continental free movement, ASEAN facilitates intra-regional mobility, Mercosur harmonizes its asylum policies. The West participates less and less in this emerging migration governance.
Young people are becoming lonelier than the elderly and reversing 60 years of social policies, and this solitude also affects aging Western societies that refuse the immigration necessary for their demographic balance. Meanwhile, the young societies of the South are organizing their mobility without waiting for the West.
Regional Economic Integration Accelerates Flows
The 168 million migrant workers are directing themselves massively toward zones of economic integration. ASEAN concentrates 14 million intra-regional migrants, Mercosur 7 million, ECOWAS 5 million. This geography follows trade agreements and free trade zones.
Thailand employs 4 million Burmese, Cambodian, and Laotian workers in its agriculture and industry. South Africa attracts 3 million Zimbabweans, Mozambicans, and Malawians. Brazil integrates 2 million Venezuelans, Haitians, and Bolivians. These integrations are negotiated between governments, not in courts or Western media.
Multinationals follow this geography. When Toyota relocates from Japan to Thailand, it recruits throughout ASEAN. When oil companies invest in Mozambique, they employ South Africans and Angolans. This regional division of labor structures new autonomous economic spaces.
Europe ages and struggles to attract. Its immigration concentrates on refugees (humanitarian constraint) and students (temporary). Economic immigration now privileges Asia, the Gulf, and Latin America. This redistribution redefines power balances: who attracts talent influences the future.
Migration becomes multipolarized like the global economy. The 304 million migrants draw a post-Western geography where South-South flows dominate, financial transfers exceed public aid, and institutional innovation shifts toward emerging host countries. The West discovers that it is no longer the center of the world migration system, just one of its possible destinations.
Sources
Sources: